Can Private Rail Freight Compete Fairly with State-Owned Operators?

The competitive landscape in the rail freight sector is under intense scrutiny as private operators like Lineas strive to gain traction against well-funded state-owned entities. Since its transition to a private entity from the Belgian National Railways’ freight subsidiary B-Logistics in 2015, Lineas has faced formidable challenges in this effort. Without key reforms and support mechanisms, the question of fair competition remains a pertinent issue for the industry.

Lineas has proposed several measures addressing the disparities they face to foster fair competition and promote a shift from road to rail. These measures acknowledge the advantage state-owned operators receive from illegal state aid and cross-subsidies, an essential concern highlighted by Lineas. Such financial supports distort market competition, making it nearly impossible for private firms to compete on equal footing. When state-owned rail companies buoyed by substantial public funds offer lower prices and better services, they effectively sideline private competitors.

The Challenge of State Aid and Cross-Subsidies

One of the primary concerns in the competitive landscape of the rail freight sector is the advantage state-owned operators receive from illegal state aid and cross-subsidies. These financial supports distort market competition and create an environment where private firms find it nearly impossible to compete on an equal footing. State-owned rail companies buoyed by substantial public funds can offer lower prices and better services, thereby sidelining private competitors.

In order to ensure fair competition, Lineas argues for the elimination of such state aid and for measures to provide a level playing field. This involves strict enforcement of European Union regulations against illegal subsidies and ensuring transparency in the financial dealings of state-owned entities. More so, scrutiny of these subsidies would inject credibility into the competitive landscape, assisting private operators like Lineas to compete fairly and sustainably in the rail freight market. Transparency will enable stakeholders and regulators to discern the true financial health and operational efficiency of these state-owned companies.

Reciprocal Access to Essential Facilities

Another critical issue in fostering fair competition in the rail freight sector is access to essential facilities, such as marshalling yards. In Belgium, private companies can freely access these facilities, but in neighboring countries, state-owned operators often do not extend this courtesy to their private counterparts. This restricted access greatly hinders the operational efficiency and market reach of private rail companies, limiting their ability to compete effectively across borders.

Lineas calls for reciprocal access agreements to be enforced across the European Union. Such agreements would ensure that private operators in Belgium gain the same access to facilities in other countries as their state-owned competitors. This reciprocity is vital for maintaining a competitive balance and fostering cross-border rail freight activities. Without such measures, private operators are at a significant disadvantage, unable to utilize the full spectrum of operational resources available to their state-owned counterparts.

Balancing Support Between Road and Rail

The disparity in governmental support between road and rail transport is another significant challenge faced by private rail freight operators. In Belgium, road transport receives around €3 billion annually, while support for rail freight is nearly negligible. This imbalance not only skews competition heavily in favor of road transport but also undermines broader efforts to promote environmentally friendly rail transport solutions.

To address this issue, Lineas advocates for a reduction in road transport subsidies and for reallocating those funds to support rail infrastructure and safety. Investments in rail transport not only level the playing field for private operators but also align with broader environmental goals aimed at reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion on roads. By equitably distributing support between road and rail, the government can foster a more balanced, sustainable transport sector that benefits both operators and the environment.

Investing in Rail Infrastructure

Insufficient investment in rail infrastructure is a major bottleneck for reliable freight operations, often prioritized below passenger train services. This prioritization leads to delays and reduced capacity for freight trains, disrupting the schedules and undermining the efficiency of freight operators. Reliable infrastructure is crucial for the smooth operation of any transportation network, and rail freight is no exception.

Lineas emphasizes the importance of adhering to the 2023-2032 investment plan agreed upon with Infrabel, which includes significant investments in rail infrastructure designed to enhance capacity and reliability. Additionally, reviewing regulations for capacity allocation can balance the needs of passenger and freight services, ensuring fairer access to the rail network. By addressing these infrastructure shortcomings, private rail operators can improve their operational reliability, making rail a more viable and efficient alternative to road transport.

Promoting Intermodal Freight Transport

Intermodal freight transport, which involves the use of multiple forms of transportation, remains underutilized in Belgium due to a significant lack of terminal capacity for intermodal solutions. This shortage hampers the seamless transfer of goods between trucks and trains, limiting the effectiveness and appeal of rail freight as an integral part of the supply chain. Increasing terminal capacity is paramount to addressing this issue.

Lineas suggests enhanced cooperation between road and rail sectors and the provision of financial incentives for road transport companies to switch to intermodal options. These measures can accelerate the adoption of intermodal transport solutions, which support the growth of private rail companies and contribute towards a more sustainable and efficient freight transport system. By promoting intermodal freight transport, the government can help reduce road congestion and lower carbon emissions, aligning with broader environmental objectives.

Conclusion

The competitive landscape in the rail freight sector is under intense scrutiny as private operators like Lineas strive to gain traction against well-funded, state-owned entities. Since evolving from the Belgian National Railways’ freight subsidiary B-Logistics to a private entity in 2015, Lineas has faced significant challenges. Without essential reforms and supportive measures, the question of fair competition remains highly relevant for the industry.

Lineas has proposed several measures to address the disparities they face, aiming to level the playing field and promote a shift from road to rail. These measures touch on the unfair advantages that state-owned operators receive through illegal state aid and cross-subsidies. Such financial supports distort market competition, making it very difficult for private firms to compete fairly. When state-owned rail companies, bolstered by substantial public funds, offer lower prices and better services, they essentially push private competitors to the sidelines. This imbalance raises essential questions about the future sustainability and fairness of the rail freight sector.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later